We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Reorganization Act 4364
Details
Submitted by[?]: Civic Republican League of Rutania
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4365
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: Military officers are only appointed through battlefield commission.
Current: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Proposed: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:04:31, March 18, 2018 CET | From | Civic Republican League of Rutania | To | Debating the Military Reorganization Act 4364 |
| Message | Open to debate. |
| Date | 14:41:04, March 18, 2018 CET | From | Rutanian Rural Party | To | Debating the Military Reorganization Act 4364 |
| Message | We approve of Article 1 but not of Article 2, therefore we are abstaining. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 479 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 93 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 178 |
| Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |