We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eye for an Eye Pact of 2195
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2197
Description[?]:
| We want to give any worker the full liberty to go on strike whenever they feel like it but on one single condition, the awareabout that they run the risk of being fired, no strings attached. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Proposed: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Secondary strike action.
Old value:: Secondary strike action is illegal. Workers and unions can only go on strike for their own pay and conditions.
Current: Only closely related trade unions can walk out on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Proposed: Any trade union can go on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Trade union strike ballots.
Old value:: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, majority approval of those that vote is needed from its members.
Current: Trade unions must by law hold a ballot of all members before going on strike, a majority of all members, regardless of if they vote or not must approve the strike action.
Proposed: Trade unions are not required by law to hold a ballot before striking.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:27:17, March 06, 2006 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Eye for an Eye Pact of 2195 |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 22:11:06, March 06, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Eye for an Eye Pact of 2195 |
| Message | Against too. |
| Date | 01:31:08, March 07, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Eye for an Eye Pact of 2195 |
| Message | Against because the first one is ridiculous. It will promote a class war that we do not want to see. Our side would win of course, limousine millionares are no match for muscled laborers, but it would be costly. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 50 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 168 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 382 |
| Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
| Random quote: "A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family." - Saul Alinsky |