We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Free-Market Cabinet Proposal of October 4370
Details
Submitted by[?]: Whig Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4371
Description[?]:
| Considering the stunning results of the election and the failure of the Free-Market parties to defeat the socialist in the Presidential contest we in the Whig Party now believe that the best course of action is to enter into dialogue with the Fascist Party of Rutania. The results of the Presidential contest clearly show that the many voters within the nation that oppose the socialist DSPR felt unsatisfied with the Coalition's candidate Ransford Barlow of the RRP. Many voters instead choice the hard-liner candidate Rafael Goodman of the RFP. The growing influence of the RFP should not be met with isolation by other parties but instead dialogue of to find what common ground we can achieve for the people. This coalition is the only alternative to a socialist controlled cabinet or one filled by the parties who support and prop up the socialist machine that is the DSPR. Together our parties can bring reasonable Free-Market reforms to the nation all the while we can still prevent extremist ideas from being put into policy. -Carson Threadgood Whig Party Chairman |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Whig Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Nationalist Conservative Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Rutanian Rural Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Rutanian Rural Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Nationalist Conservative Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Whig Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Rutanian Rural Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Whig Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Nationalist Conservative Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the United Democratic Party of Rutania
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the 
Liberal Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Democratic Party of Rutania
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:56:59, March 30, 2018 CET | From | Civic Republican League of Rutania | To | Debating the Free-Market Cabinet Proposal of October 4370 |
| Message | We are we not surprised that the crypto-fascist Whigs are so open to "dialogue" with the openly fascist RFP? They spent all of half an election cycle pretending they abhorred extremism. |
| Date | 18:34:38, March 30, 2018 CET | From | Rutanian Rural Party | To | Debating the Free-Market Cabinet Proposal of October 4370 |
| Message | The RRP will not accept a cabinet with the Fascists in it. |
| Date | 07:49:33, March 31, 2018 CET | From | United Democratic Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Free-Market Cabinet Proposal of October 4370 |
| Message | The UDPR agrees, we will not allow Fascists into the cabinet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 293 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 457 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |