Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 03:25:49
Server time: 12:34:10, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): GLNBei | h48191 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Autonomy for Arglon

Details

Submitted by[?]: Restoration Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2064

Description[?]:

Our departmental obligations require us to consider every option at our disposal to end the civil war, and yes it is a war, currently scurging our great country.

As a solution, we will propose a constitutional ammendment, or series of ammendments, to do the following:

Arglon wukk be granted FULL autonomy of domestic policy, but agrees to defer to the federal govt for foreign affiars, and to apply all of the tenets of the constition (i.e. laws can differ, but nothing at of harmony with the constitution itself)

Second, by voting yes, all rebels agee to lay down their arms, and maintain allegiance to the new consitution.

This federal arrangement will clearly be tested by the drama of our electoral system. For this reason, we feel it s important to have some ceremonial head of state beyond the elected president. This ammendment calls for us to invite the current heir to restore the throne here. The state will contribute no funds to the upkeep of the Habsburg estate, but will naturally cover costs for government related travel. This change will in no way alter the powers of the elected president, but is intended as a symbol to unite our disparate peoples.

In light of the autonomy of these two states, our nation will be known as:

Valurzian Federation:
A Habsburg Federation of 2 Empires.

Finally, Arglon will have a new capital city to celebrate their autonomy.

I hope you will seriously consider this proposal.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:41:56, June 05, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
Messagenot sure actually if this is just a law or an ammendment?

Date23:04:53, June 05, 2005 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageOOC: Please do not use Real Life characters like the Habsburg dynasty :)

The Lib Dems are totally against a ceremonial Head of State. Also creating a new city and making it a capital is very expensive. Furthermore it's preposterous and ridicolous to have a city named after a politician who supports terrorism.

We shall vote no!

Date23:27:15, June 05, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageIf we drop the part that has to do with renaming their capital would that change your vote?

Date00:11:22, June 06, 2005 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageNo. I don't think it will change.

Date18:25:21, June 06, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageWe support a ceromonial head of state, maybe if we just went with Arglon instead of Hulbark, then we will vote yes, we dont have enough support in Hulbark.

Date18:26:48, June 06, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageHowever we gained 66% in Arglon, 2/3rds of the vote, definate mandate.

We urge others to respect the wish of the people.

Date21:22:17, June 06, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageGet this to vote, if they vote against they are ignoring democracy

Date00:10:56, June 07, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageLib Dems--does this strike you as something you can support.

Date00:11:27, June 07, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
Message...and do we agree that this can be done as an 'arrangement' without a constitutional change?

Date09:57:01, June 07, 2005 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageLib Dems--does this strike you as something you can support.
---

No, can't support it.

Date13:13:06, June 07, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
Message? so your ignoring the wish of the voters?

Date13:13:23, June 07, 2005 CET
From Red Arglon-Hulbark Liberation Front
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
Messagevote yes restoration

Date15:28:57, June 08, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
MessageITs not too late to change your votes. Think about the children who deserve peace. We sure will be pointing that out in our election pamphlets!

Date21:49:19, June 08, 2005 CET
From Restoration Party
ToDebating the Autonomy for Arglon
Messageok it s too late...after the election!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 71

no
    

Total Seats: 104

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

    Random quote: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." - Bill Clinton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60