Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 02:17:14
Server time: 21:42:45, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sports Unity Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2065

Description[?]:

It is hereby proposed that one of our three listed national sports be removed from the listing.
At present, listing three sports gives Likatonia a fractured national image.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:02:12, June 05, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageWhich of the three that goes is less important.

The LFP would vote for retaining Football and Fencing.

Date00:33:19, June 06, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageFencing should go

Date05:29:05, June 06, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageBy the way - everyone, COMMENT here. This is a mini-vote before the proposal is added on which should go.

Date06:25:59, June 06, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageI back LFP

Date11:46:18, June 06, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageFencing is interesting. I agree with LFP too. rugby is quite brutal, if we are worrying about our national image, so that would be the best one to get rid of.

Date15:44:17, June 06, 2005 CET
FromSDP
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageI propose Darts as national sport.

Date23:18:58, June 06, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageSo far we have more votes for removing rugby than anything else, so I'll form that as a proposal.

SDP: No to darts. Out of our current three sports, however, which do you like least?

Date23:45:51, June 06, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageFootball should go. And both forms! They are both boring as hell, and take too long to play.

Date05:02:20, June 07, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageAmericanized football is just designed to sell products. We never supported it to begin with.

Soccer isn't commercialized, at least.

I don't know anything about Rugby besides the name, hence why I think it ought to go.

Fencing, I'll agree, is the most interesting sport in our lineup.

Date07:44:16, June 07, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageRugby should stay it isnt Brutal maybe any of the Gumby matches youve seen but it is "The Game They play in Heaven!"

Rugby's a ball pass it on!

Date13:24:46, June 07, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
Messagein my experience it involves a face full of frozen mud with somebody sitting on you. but then sport was never my strong point...

Date13:17:11, June 08, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageThats isnt Rugby thats Frozen Mud Wrestling.

If you had a chance to see any of The British and Irish Lions Tour on right now youd understand what Rugby is!

They play Provincial Teams you dont See Football/Soccer Teams do that!-They play Friendlies ie games that mean nothing!

Date13:17:59, June 08, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageBy nothing i mean Clubs wont necasarily release players as they arent in a MAjor Comp!

Ditch Football!

Date14:04:03, June 08, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
Messageso does rugby (aka. frozen mud wrestling) have any other supporters among the council?

Date06:14:52, June 09, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageWhat does it matter what the national sport is?

Date12:00:03, June 09, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageIm not the one who proposed it in the first place so surely there must..
Unles it was Labour...

Date12:32:31, June 09, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageLLP: It doesn't, it's a flavor thing, a part of our national image.
I'm going to take it to vote as it is so people can say yay or nay and if you all disagree, propose something of your own.

Date06:59:48, June 10, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Sports Unity Act
MessageYour all going to Hell for your Ignorance!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 148

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 45


    Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

    Random quote: "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat." - Don Reagan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 86