We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Necessary Seizure Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Whig Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4377
Description[?]:
| In effort to promote economic development in the Commonwealth the nations policies should support economic development and adopt measures that allow the Commonwealth to remove any obstacles to economic growth. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:46:50, April 12, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Necessary Seizure Act |
| Message | Seizing private property is a little too much. |
| Date | 11:46:50, April 12, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Necessary Seizure Act |
| Message | Seizing private property is a little too much. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 97 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 531 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 122 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |