Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 01:20:37
Server time: 22:39:22, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Autokrator30 | burgerboys | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Axis Mundi Capitol Relocation Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2197

Description[?]:

Axis Mundi Anarch Anakousites would like to place before the convocation, the suggestion that we relocate our nation's Capitol (and, thus, our capital) to St. Vodinsburg, Sorbanika.

Sorbanika is our most populated prefecture, so there is a certain amount of logic to relocating the Capitol to be near as many citizens, and as many of 'the people', as possible.

As the AAP faction has previously suggested, why not use St. Vodinsburg Cathedral Monastery (which has been empty for years) as the Capitol and seat of civil office, and relocate the Convocation assembly to St. Vodinsburg Cathedral Chapter House (the eight-sided former auditorium?)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:08:10, March 08, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Axis Mundi Capitol Relocation Bill
MessageThis proposal is a RESOLUTION.

The AM AAP decided (AFTER we had sent this in, unfortunately) not to debate the issue again, but go straight to a vote.

Voting in THIS proposal will not change anything, please vote in the OTHER Bill with the same name.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 263

no
    

Total Seats: 182

abstain
 

Total Seats: 56


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "I believe that guns don't kill people, husbands that come home early do." - Larry the Cable Guy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37