Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 03:40:50
Server time: 12:19:09, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Kubrick2 | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2196

Details

Submitted by[?]: Whigs

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2197

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:25:45, March 08, 2006 CET
FromAntiNeoCon Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageWe will not vote yes until both us and Green Socialists are included.

Date03:31:22, March 09, 2006 CET
FromSocialist Ecology Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageWho said you had to vote yes, go right ahead and excersize your right to vote on the bill. Yay democracy!

Date06:16:33, March 09, 2006 CET
FromAntiNeoCon Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
Messagei'm only voicing the conditions of my voting.

Date15:42:27, March 09, 2006 CET
FromGreen Socialists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageI only want the ANCP to be included - i recognize that my party is smaller so I don't deserve it as much as the ANCP

Date17:13:53, March 09, 2006 CET
FromAll Types Of Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageI want to be included as well that why I had a Bill for early election ,so that the smaller parties could some seats

Date21:06:10, March 09, 2006 CET
FromCrimson Conservative Elite
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageAlthough I voted no, I understand your reasoning for this proposal. I guess I can go along with it for now, but I hope that when I finally have a descent share of seats my party will be included.

Date03:47:46, March 10, 2006 CET
FromAntiNeoCon Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
Messagenew parties won't have seats until your awareness is raised.
if you'll notice, i didnt get any seats at all until my second election.

Date07:17:17, March 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Socialists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2196
MessageI suppose that it would not make sense for the ANCP, ATWP, or the GS to be included in a cabinet composed of, in my humble opinion, conservatives led by a conservative leader. I respect the decision of the Whigs, as they are the majority party and represent the majority of Quanzari's citizens.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 462

no
    

Total Seats: 288

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself.

    Random quote: "Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79