We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religion Act I
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Real Politics (URP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2197
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:22:52, March 09, 2006 CET | From | Socialibertarian Party | To | Debating the Religion Act I |
Message | Why restrict the freedom of the public to express their religion? |
Date | 20:20:00, March 09, 2006 CET | From | Civic Platform | To | Debating the Religion Act I |
Message | Religion it war and disruption |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 48 | |||
no | Total Seats: 52 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |