We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reducing Unnecessary Federal Fiat (RUFF) for Pets Act of 4389
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Liberal Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4390
Description[?]:
| Currently owners must register their pets with local governments. This bill would eliminate that unneeded regulation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:45:09, May 06, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reducing Unnecessary Federal Fiat (RUFF) for Pets Act of 4389 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I rise to ask this house if it would support the RUFF Act, a bill to reduce pet regulation. Currently all pet owners must register their pets with local governments. This puts an undue burden on both pet owners and local governments! What good does registration of fifi and fido do? It doesn't stop people from breaking laws against ownership of exotic animals - do we truly think that someone who owns an ocelot or rhino would register that animal? Let us rid ourselves of this silly regulation. When the going gets tough, vote RUFF! Fiona O'Neill MP for Constantine City Centre New Liberal Backbencher |
| Date | 14:02:56, May 08, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reducing Unnecessary Federal Fiat (RUFF) for Pets Act of 4389 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are shocked that our Royalist friends are voting in favour of regulation! It seems a bit "off-brand." Mr. Speaker, I would love to know why the Conservatives have decided that every pet owner should register that pet with the government! Is that not a gross intrusion into personal property rights? Fiona O'Neill MP for Constantine City Centre New Liberal Backbencher |
| Date | 15:51:23, May 08, 2018 CET | From |  Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reducing Unnecessary Federal Fiat (RUFF) for Pets Act of 4389 |
| Message | OOC: in my case it was a misclick, thanks for alerting me though lol |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 283 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 122 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." - Henry David Thoreau |