Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 02:39:16
Server time: 09:20:43, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: Crimson Conservative Elite

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2198

Description[?]:

Just a few changes that need to be made.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:17:46, March 09, 2006 CET
FromAll Types Of Workers Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageI am voting no for both

Date21:59:41, March 09, 2006 CET
FromBonetrom Socialist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
Messageyes

Date22:57:13, March 09, 2006 CET
FromGreen Socialists
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageI am against both - Article 2 will only promote global arms buildups, which can only hurt Quanzari's economy. Prisoner's of War are not our citizens, therefore they should be treated according to the international standards, which are generally more humane.

Date01:35:24, March 10, 2006 CET
FromAntiNeoCon Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
Messagewe are for the second proposal, but not the first

Date02:37:54, March 10, 2006 CET
FromSocialist Ecology Party
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageThe SEP strongly agrees with each proposal.

Date06:48:46, March 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Socialists
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageAlthough an arms deal to a neutral country may sound like a good deal in the present, in the future such an action would have huge consequences. War does not help anyone, especially the lower-middle class workers who are called upon to fight the wars of richer companies. I am against bills which would strengthen the war machine. I will compromise by allowing exports to close, long term allies.

Date16:15:44, March 10, 2006 CET
FromWhigs
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageI disagree with the first, but I agree with the second, and I would vote for this bill as is, although I would like to see the articles split up. However, if i must, I'll vote for both.

Date22:04:00, March 10, 2006 CET
FromCrimson Conservative Elite
ToDebating the Military Reform
Messageto the Whigs: if this bill passes, the Crimson Conservative Elite would be willing to make compromises and possibly change the policy set forth by the second article in a later bill.

Date02:35:10, March 13, 2006 CET
FromCorporatists for Quanzari
ToDebating the Military Reform
MessageWe apologize for our absence in this matter; we heavily agree with this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 385

no
  

Total Seats: 191

abstain
  

Total Seats: 174


Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

Random quote: "I consider myself a citizen of the world!" - Charlie Chaplin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 90