Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 02:28:41
Server time: 17:31:18, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | GLNBei | hyraemous | lulus | Mity1 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Hutori

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4392

Description[?]:

Preventing strikes for ridiculous reasons, meanwhile still ensuring workers have rights. This is to ensure the interest of both business and the worker

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:37:02, May 11, 2018 CET
FromNew Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments
MessageMr. Speaker,

The New Liberals have a long record of pushing for Labour Reform. However, as this bill puts too much power in the hands of employers, we cannot support it.

Russell Selwyn
MP for Sutton East
Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals

Date14:48:02, May 11, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments
MessageMr Speaker

Please explain why this bill puts too much power in the place of employers?

Fredrick Stanton
MP for Fairfield
Justice Spokesperson for the National Reform Party

Date16:46:28, May 11, 2018 CET
FromNew Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments
MessageMr Speaker,

I know of no example of a time in which employers believe a strike is justified - regardless of whether the greater public or government thinks a strike is reasonable. Employers would fire every striker, every time. It is for this reason that when we have supported labour reform in the past, we have have pushed for a provision that would require employers to seek government approval before firing striking workers. If the people do not support the employer, they'll remember that in the voting booth. Government provides a check on employers, voters provide a check on government.

Furthermore, Article 2 is unnecessary if Article 1 passes. When have you ever heard of an employer who believes a sympathy strike is a worthy endeavour?!

This is a poorly written bill that will result in a reduction of labour protections. We will not support it.

Russell Selwyn
MP for Sutton East
Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 169

no
     

Total Seats: 229

abstain
 

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned.

Random quote: "Religion, like capitalism, will perish in the end. We estimate the complete Terra-wide extinction of Hosianism as a religious belief by the year 4409, and in Dorvik by 4398." - Friedrich Pfeiffer, former Dorvish politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54