We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Hutori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4392
Description[?]:
Preventing strikes for ridiculous reasons, meanwhile still ensuring workers have rights. This is to ensure the interest of both business and the worker |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Proposed: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Secondary strike action.
Old value:: Any trade union can go on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Current: Secondary strike action is illegal. Workers and unions can only go on strike for their own pay and conditions.
Proposed: Only closely related trade unions can walk out on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:37:02, May 11, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The New Liberals have a long record of pushing for Labour Reform. However, as this bill puts too much power in the hands of employers, we cannot support it. Russell Selwyn MP for Sutton East Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals |
Date | 14:48:02, May 11, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments |
Message | Mr Speaker Please explain why this bill puts too much power in the place of employers? Fredrick Stanton MP for Fairfield Justice Spokesperson for the National Reform Party |
Date | 16:46:28, May 11, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Reform Party Bill 33 - Striking Law Amendments |
Message | Mr Speaker, I know of no example of a time in which employers believe a strike is justified - regardless of whether the greater public or government thinks a strike is reasonable. Employers would fire every striker, every time. It is for this reason that when we have supported labour reform in the past, we have have pushed for a provision that would require employers to seek government approval before firing striking workers. If the people do not support the employer, they'll remember that in the voting booth. Government provides a check on employers, voters provide a check on government. Furthermore, Article 2 is unnecessary if Article 1 passes. When have you ever heard of an employer who believes a sympathy strike is a worthy endeavour?! This is a poorly written bill that will result in a reduction of labour protections. We will not support it. Russell Selwyn MP for Sutton East Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 169 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 229 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 7 |
Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
Random quote: "Religion, like capitalism, will perish in the end. We estimate the complete Terra-wide extinction of Hosianism as a religious belief by the year 4409, and in Dorvik by 4398." - Friedrich Pfeiffer, former Dorvish politician |