Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:37:34
Server time: 03:22:25, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | MyungKun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Call for early elections, March 4398

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: December 4398

Description[?]:

We, the Progressive Socialist Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:00:54, May 24, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Socialist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageMr. speaker,

As numerous new parties are organizing within our great nation, with numerous support, it might be prudent to have early elections

Date19:02:31, May 24, 2018 CET
FromEcosocialist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Ecosocialist Party agrees with the PSP: for the good of our democracy, we have to call out early elections soon

Date19:02:51, May 24, 2018 CET
FromParty For Liberation of the People
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageThe Party for Liberation of the People is fully supporting this bill

Date19:12:54, May 24, 2018 CET
FromParty For Liberation of the People
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageThe Party for Liberation of the People is fully supporting this bill

Date21:47:38, May 24, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Progressives
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Liberal Party supports this bill.

Date21:50:38, May 24, 2018 CET
FromAnimal Liberation Front
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageMr speaker,

Every day this government is allowed to stay in power is another day where those who need to be heard are not heard. The countless of non-human animals deserve a seat in this parliament and with this bill the day where we will be able to let that voice fill the air in this room will come closer. We, The Animal Liberation Front, wholeheartedly support this bill.

May the spirits of life guide you on your vote.

Date02:25:07, May 25, 2018 CET
FromLodamese Democratic Progressive Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
Message// OOC: Holding an early election now as new parties without visibility would result in no new seat gains. You have to vote on bills and wait for them to pass or fail to gain visibility for the people on your political positions. You won't get seats unless you have at least one political position with at least moderate visibility. Given all this activity and all the bills that are being proposed/voted on, I think the people will have good visibility of all the parties by the time of the 4401 elections.

Date13:37:40, May 25, 2018 CET
FromGrand Nationalist Fraction
ToDebating the Call for early elections, March 4398
MessageMr. Speaker,

since a lot of bills are being voted upon, we don't wish to put them back. That's why we don't support this motion.

Christophe Wolts
LNC fraction leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 149

abstain
 

Total Seats: 450


Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74