We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of September 4399
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4400
Description[?]:
The Progressive Conservative Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Federal Union of Gaduridos. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 500,000,000 GAD | 3,500,000,000 GAD | 10,000,000 GAD |
Foreign Affairs | 500,000,000 GAD | 30,000,000,000 GAD | 30,000,000,000 GAD |
Internal Affairs | 100,000,000,000 GAD | 120,000,000,000 GAD | 120,000,000,000 GAD |
Finance | 50,000,000,000 GAD | 14,000,000,000 GAD | 14,000,000,000 GAD |
Defence | 10,000,000,000 GAD | 350,000,000,000 GAD | 350,000,000,000 GAD |
Justice | 10,000,000,000 GAD | 50,050,000,000 GAD | 50,050,000,000 GAD |
Infrastructure and Transport | 500,000,000,000 GAD | 90,000,000,000 GAD | 90,000,000,000 GAD |
Health and Social Services | 1,100,000,000,000 GAD | 225,000,000,000 GAD | 225,000,000,000 GAD |
Education and Culture | 900,000,000,000 GAD | 310,000,000,000 GAD | 310,000,000,000 GAD |
Science and Technology | 500,000,000,000 GAD | 287,500,000,000 GAD | 287,500,000,000 GAD |
Food and Agriculture | 60,000,000,000 GAD | 10,000,000,000 GAD | 10,000,000,000 GAD |
Environment and Tourism | 60,000,000,000 GAD | 50,000,000,000 GAD | 50,000,000,000 GAD |
Trade and Industry | 400,000,000,000 GAD | 30,000,000,000 GAD | 30,000,000,000 GAD |
Total | 3,691,000,000,000 GAD | 1,570,050,000,000 GAD | 1,566,560,000,000 GAD |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:58:52, May 27, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | PCP agrees that the HoG budget should be reduced. We ask whether the other parties believe the proposed reduction is too much, too little, or an appropriate amount. Pablo Altuve Minister of Finance |
Date | 18:17:57, May 27, 2018 CET | From | NLP | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | Doing a very rough calculation with GDP/population yields ~ 115,000 GAD. I believe that we should use this rough metric * 10 = 1,150,000GAD for the HoG Budget. This should be sufficient and fair. |
Date | 19:48:57, May 27, 2018 CET | From | Green Progressive Alliance [PAG] | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | We can agree on this if the HoG salary is as the NLP proposes. |
Date | 21:55:06, May 27, 2018 CET | From | Golden Legion of Gaduridos [CAG] | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | The GLG does not believe the HoG budget should be reduced. |
Date | 06:21:08, May 28, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | Due to the lack of unanimity, we're going to stick with 10,000,000 GAD as an immediate fix. Further cuts or a restoration of funding can be discussed under the next government. Pablo Altuve Minister of Finance |
Date | 06:23:11, May 28, 2018 CET | From | NLP | To | Debating the Budget proposal of September 4399 |
Message | Given that the government has been in agreement to hold elections imminently, we think that this policy should be left to the next administration overall, at this point. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 152 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 148 |
Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction. |
Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |