We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Border Security
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2198
Description[?]:
| A nation like ours, with long borders with our neighbors, there is a need for security. Therefore we propose stricter security checks. We are not restricting access to our country, just making sure those that get in are not here to work against our nation. Law abiding travelers have nothing to fear by this law, the only one that stands to lose are terrorists |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:15:15, March 10, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Border Security |
| Message | If terrorists really want to they can easily sneak into the country without going through border checkpoints. |
| Date | 21:39:28, March 10, 2006 CET | From | Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party | To | Debating the Border Security |
| Message | Thats no reason to not increase security |
| Date | 06:33:04, March 11, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Border Security |
| Message | Why waste money that can be better spent elsewhere? |
| Date | 07:26:56, March 11, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Border Security |
| Message | I really detest the "If you've done nothing wrong, then you shouldn't worry about this restriction" arguement. I feel that innocents shouldn't be forced to prove themselves. |
| Date | 03:55:06, March 12, 2006 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Border Security |
| Message | I feel that we need more than minimal security checks but we don't need as the bill suggests overly strict ones which cause a decline in trade and tourists amongst other things. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 31 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 69 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary |