We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Open debate: Cabinet formation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Striving for Gaduridos [PAG]
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4482
Description[?]:
| Dear parties of Gaduridos, We want to congratulate all of you with the results of the past elections! In this open debate we would like to discuss possible cabinet formations. Please share your opinions and ideas here. Kind regards, Irene Adelaide President of the Federal Union of Gaduridos |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:47:33, May 31, 2018 CET | From | NLP | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | OOC: No ideological centered coalition seems to be able to be formed. 163 seats for majority Left: SfG-GPA-GL = 135, 28 seats off of majority Center: SfG-NLP-PCP = 147 seats, 16 seats off of majority. Adding RNM, 183 seats, if other parties are interested. Right: GLG-NLP-RNM = 153 seats, 10 seats off of majority. Adding PCP would provide majority if PCP is willing to work with GLG. Likely blocs: SfG-GPA = 100 seats NLP-RNM = 84 seats SfG-PCP-GPA (old guard) = 137 seats, 26 seats off majority. GLG-NLP-RNM (The New Right) = 153 seats, 10 off majority. No coalition could be possibly formed with less than 4 parties, given that GLG and SfG are largest parties. (Only 3 party coalition mathematically possible would involve GLG-SfG-NLP, which let's be honest, will not happen) </analysis> Also, headcannon is that all GL gains are from that burn against the NLP. Though a GL in-government seems unlikely in this cycle, so touche? |
| Date | 11:59:55, May 31, 2018 CET | From | NLP | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | We propose a SfG-NLP-PCP-RNM coalition for devolution of powers. The goal of this coalition would be to devolve legislation to their local communities. This would provide 184 seats in Parliament. We invite the PCP, RNM, and SfG to comment on whether this would be possible. |
| Date | 14:11:48, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Striving for Gaduridos [PAG] | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | SfG is interested in that proposal. We would like to see what is possible. Another option could be SFG-NLP-GPA-RNM, we invite everyone to give their opinion this proposal as well. |
| Date | 16:17:13, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Green Progressive Alliance [PAG] | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | OOC: Jesus FML ... this is another deadlock election haha! Mss. President, We congratulate all parties of Gaduridos on their results, be it good or bad. Although we as the GPA won 2 seats, we feel that first the right wing parties should try to form a government. The debate in this Cabinet formation and the past was about the right-wing parties. I suggest that the Golden Legion tries to form a government with the NLP, RNM and PCP. GPA is open to negotiations with all parties, but we do not want to be the fourth vehicle in a purely right-wing cabinet. |
| Date | 18:55:47, May 31, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | PCP is interested in the suggested SfG-NLP-PCP-RNM coalition. All parties involved have expressed some support for empowering local communities in the past couple of years, and we believe that these parties will have the ability to reach some level of consensus and effectively govern. |
| Date | 20:09:21, November 07, 2018 CET | From |  Moderation | To | Debating the Open debate: Cabinet formation |
| Message | OOC: Archiving |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 500 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |