We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environment Act of 4405.
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Democratic Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4405
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector and is unregulated.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: Industrial pollution is not regulated by the government.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: Private cars are not allowed.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: Local governments decide about this.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities for public use.
Proposed: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:14:36, June 07, 2018 CET | From | Republican Centrist Alliance | To | Debating the Environment Act of 4405. |
Message | No private cars! This is nothing less then radical environmentalism, more then that even. Richard White President of the Federal Republic of Likatonia Party Chairman of the Republican Centrist Alliance. |
Date | 00:05:04, June 08, 2018 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the Environment Act of 4405. |
Message | The ban of private cars goes too far, when a ban on environment damaging cars would cause the desired effect without damaging our society. We will vote for, but if the bill passes we will propose to lift the ban on cars. Martha Lyndon SLP Leader |
Date | 04:34:50, June 08, 2018 CET | From | Democratic Union Party | To | Debating the Environment Act of 4405. |
Message | I do not believe the Democratic Union Part can vote in favor of this bill on the ground of the extreme nature of Article 5. Louis Thibodeaux II House Party Leader Chairman of the Democratic Union Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 123 | |||
no | Total Seats: 142 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "We here thank those in Deltaria who put [Zardic spy Mona Rivet] to justice in the most humane way possible. With bullets." - Sergio Rodriguez, former Egelian journalist |