We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Disobedience
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2199
Description[?]:
| succesful protesting teaches people that civil disobedience works. The government should maintain power over them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Secondary strike action.
Old value:: Any trade union can go on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Current: Only closely related trade unions can walk out on a sympathy strike in support of other striking workers.
Proposed: Secondary strike action is illegal. Workers and unions can only go on strike for their own pay and conditions.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The workers' right to strike.
Old value:: All workers have the right to strike.
Current: All workers have the right to strike.
Proposed: All workers, except certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society, have the right to strike.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:11:43, March 11, 2006 CET | From | Socialistic democrats | To | Debating the Civil Disobedience |
| Message | I would prefer if you'd change the first article to something less brutal.... |
| Date | 13:58:08, March 12, 2006 CET | From | Combination Unto Constitution | To | Debating the Civil Disobedience |
| Message | We will oppose. But you surely expected that. |
| Date | 18:19:19, March 12, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Civil Disobedience |
| Message | Changed the 1st one for SDP, CUCP, I almost hope this fails, so I can propose it again, I'm running out of bills I disagree with... |
| Date | 22:10:22, March 12, 2006 CET | From | Socialistic democrats | To | Debating the Civil Disobedience |
| Message | I appreciate the change and support this bill. Oh and by the way you don't have to put the "P" at the end of every party abbreviation, it only confuses people :) Just to explain, we are the Socialistic democrats (SD) not the socialistic democrats party. It just doesn't work that way :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 66 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 65 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 169 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton |