Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5471
Next month in: 02:18:09
Server time: 05:41:50, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Not within the Purview of the Government Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kadima Beiteynu

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4408

Description[?]:

This is a little ridiculous. Condoms cost 25 cents at gas stations. This just not a responsibility of the government. Adult citizens are not babies or mindless sheep, and they don't need a nanny state. If you and your partner collectively can't afford a 25-cent condom, abstinence is a viable option until you get the cents together. We aren't wild animals, we can control ourselves. Condoms are not a human right nor are they necessary for life, nor are expensive in any way, shape, or form. Even homeless people have a few bucks on them, who is this policy for? I think abstinence until marriage would be a good idea for people who can afford 25-cent contraceptives, so why can't people (who might not exist) without 25-cents collectively be abstinent? They don't have to though, any two people can find a way to get 25-cents very quickly. Also, why should we force people who may have abstained until marriage to pay for free stuff for people who just don't want to?

Having sex is a choice, and the nanny-state needn't get involved.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:09:18, June 12, 2018 CET
Fromמַהְפֵּכָה (Revolution)
ToDebating the Not within the Purview of the Government Act
MessageThis bill misunderstands a key point: not only condoms are being discounted. A wide variety of contraceptives are being discounted, which allow for people to make smart and safe choices for their own family planning and health.

Sex is an important part of life for people, that cannot be misunderstood. It is not feasible to force people to be sexually inactive so as to prevent disease or unwanted pregnancy, sex is going to happen and all this does is make safe sex harder.

Dlila Yeshurun
Minister of Health and Social Services

Date23:26:58, June 12, 2018 CET
FromKadima Beiteynu
ToDebating the Not within the Purview of the Government Act
MessageWe aren't forcing people to do anything. They have a choice, and being irresponsible is always an option. They can still have sex if they want. You want to force people to pay for the free stuff of others.

Date23:39:40, June 13, 2018 CET
Fromמַהְפֵּכָה (Revolution)
ToDebating the Not within the Purview of the Government Act
MessageYou keep on putting across this narrative that government expenses are 'forcing people to pay for things'. You have the absolute responsibility to help the less fortunate, that's how a modern country should work. What if I don't want to pay for our military? I still would pay the taxes because it's my responsibility to uphold our defences.

Dlila Yeshurun
Minister of Health and Social Services

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 53

no
 

Total Seats: 14

abstain
 

Total Seats: 53


Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

Random quote: "No man can outrun a bullet." - Idi Amin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49