We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 4408
Details
Submitted by[?]: Soul & Spirit
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4409
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 4
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the National Coalition Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 9
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 10
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 11
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 12
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Soul & Spirit
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the United Left
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:48:32, June 14, 2018 CET | From | Soul & Spirit | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4408 |
| Message | As the Socialists clearly desire to not participate in a cabinet with us under the condition of only having one ministry (perhaps at all), and the National Coalition seem to be forever hesitating on voting yes, we have decided to make a different deal appealing to the United Left instead. Doing some incredibly simple math proves that one ministry for each party is fair for everyone involved, and is certainly better than being in a coalition with the fascists. If we can come to an agreement on supporting free market policies and not voluntarily reducing our military by a single man, then we should all be in agreement. |
| Date | 22:14:06, June 14, 2018 CET | From | National Coalition Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4408 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Does the right honourable gentlemen really think that we will partner with his government without serious talks regarding dangerous deregulation. If he wishes to lead us into his government then I suggest he approaches for talks. |
| Date | 00:39:44, June 15, 2018 CET | From | Soul & Spirit | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4408 |
| Message | Mr. Bennington is more than willing to engage in talks in regards to negotiating our economic laws with the National Coalition. If you wish to negotiate with him, then his phone is on at any time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 153 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 177 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |