We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Protocols
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Luthori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4410
Description[?]:
| The Conservatives hereby introduce this environmental bill to reform our nation's policies on environmental security. Amanda Holland, Leader of the Conservatives |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Proposed: Local governments decide about this.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:07:50, June 16, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Environmental Protocols |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I have to laugh once again Mr Speaker, because once again, this Government is divided. This Government couldn't run a bath l, let alone run a country. It's time they went Ben Sullivan (TUSC - Leader) |
| Date | 00:24:42, June 16, 2018 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Environmental Protocols |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This is not a Government bill so I, like the voters, am perplexed by the TUSC. Frederick Stinson |
| Date | 00:50:38, June 16, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Environmental Protocols |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Whether or not a bill is submitted by the Government, if the Coalition Parties vote different ways, then the Government is by definition divided Ben Sullivan (TUSC - Leader) |
| Date | 01:23:58, June 16, 2018 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Environmental Protocols |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Rubbish. A Coalition does not have to vote together when they are not Coalition Government bills. It can only be divided if it disagrees on a position or decision required as a Coalition or by the Government, since each party retains its sovereignty in Diet votes. Frederick Stinson |
| Date | 21:23:09, June 16, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Environmental Protocols |
| Message | Mr Speaker, It doesn't matter who's bill it is, if the Government votes different ways then they're divided. Ben Sullivan (TUSC - Leader) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 142 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 266 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 37 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |