We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Respect for Conscientious Objectors Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4410
Description[?]:
| Nobody should be forced to participate in warfare - and those who object are not going to be of much use anyway. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Current: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Proposed: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:28:04, June 16, 2018 CET | From |  Progressive Worker's Party | To | Debating the Respect for Conscientious Objectors Act |
| Message | Non-combat positions are just as important as combat positions. Without food, fuel, and ammunition, the army can do nothing. Besides, we currently do not have national service, so no one has to serve. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 479 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 271 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman |