We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Luthori People's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4410
Description[?]:
| Fredoom and Liberty. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Current: Abortion policies are established by local governments
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy of the government concerning the funding of abortions
Old value:: The government only funds abortions for medical emergencies.
Current: The government only funds abortions for medical emergencies.
Proposed: The government provides abortion funding only for low-income earners.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the use of forensic DNA databases.
Old value:: DNA from persons accused or convicted for a crime is recorded.
Current: Only DNA from persons convicted of crime is recorded.
Proposed: No DNA is recorded.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Current: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Proposed: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Everyone may adopt children.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: Adultery is a capital offence.
Current: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Proposed: Adultery is legal.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Current: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Proposed: The government has no policy concerning crossdressing.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: The government actively promotes population growth.
Current: The government actively promotes population growth.
Proposed: The government does not engage in population control.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Homosexual relations are illegal, but are not prosecuted.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Article 10
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships and prosecute those who pursue a polygamous lifestyle.
Current: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships and prosecute those who pursue a polygamous lifestyle.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Article 11
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Article 12
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: The police may only disperse a crowd if a state of emergency has been declared.
Article 13
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the ability to change the legal definition of one's gender
Old value:: Individuals are not allowed to change their legal gender identity.
Current: The government allows the individual to decide on gender identity.
Proposed: The government allows the individual to decide on gender identity.
Article 14
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on inheritance
Old value:: There are no regulated inheritance laws, inheritance is only regulated by the will of deceased.
Current: There is a regulated inheritance law, private regulation of inheritance is allowed but also regulated.
Proposed: There is a regulated inheritance law, private regulation of inheritance is allowed but also regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:08:40, June 17, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We would take a different approach to articles 3 and 13, but on the whole this is a very good bill, one which I believe should be passed. For that reason the TUSC will support it. Ellesha Wilson (TUSC - Internal Affairs spokeswoman) |
| Date | 12:59:23, June 17, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This bill is indeed very aptly named. The Liberal Republicans propose to doom Luthori with their perverted ideas of 'equality'. Preventing the police from taking DNA samples from convicted criminals most certainly does not promote equality, although we would be willing to support a move towards taking samples from convicts only. Equality is not outright legalising adultery. We have already proposed sufficient measures to end the hangings of such sinners. I yield. Richard Bartle Leader of the Municipal Party |
| Date | 00:18:08, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Can I ask the Leader of the Municipal Party why adultery should be a criminal offence? It's not directly harming someone is it? Why do members of this chamber wish to impose their individual view of morality on their fellow citizens? Ellesha Wilson (TUSC - Internal Affairs Spokeswoman) |
| Date | 00:42:22, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party of Luthori | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree with certain articles within this act, though we oppose the majority of it. Amanda Hall Leader of the Conservatives |
| Date | 05:15:47, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Royalist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr.Speaker, We Oppose Article No.3 as we believe that The DNA of Convicts should be recorded,However we will vote yes as we agree with almost all of the other articles Nancy Harper, Leader of the Royalist Liberal Party |
| Date | 14:38:19, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Adultery is a mortal sin. It is frankly disgusting that the honourable member sees fit to describe it as a victimless crime. Adultery causes emotional harm for all involved and poisons marriages. It is no wonder the sinful and depraved left has been rejected by the people of Luthori, for the working man has no sympathy for adulterers and other unrepentant sinners. I yield. Richard Bartle Leader of the Municipal Party |
| Date | 21:18:11, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Trade Union and Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Considering that the Honourable member endorsed the Governor General Mr Brighton for re-election, I don't think he can treat us as too different from him. The only difference is we don't hop into bed with the neoliberals for an extra ministerial car, we have our principles and we stick to them in this Party. The working men and women of this country as requested shown by the results of the election we recently had to be supporters of the Left in great numbers. As usual the middle class and the elite managed to swing the diet back to the extent that the right was one parties betrayal away from staying in Government, and luckily they had a willing betrayer. Some Jokes also cause emotional harm, but no one other than a fascist would say that jokes that offend people should be banned. This is the most authoritarian ideal ever concieved, the idea that sexual activity between two consenting adults in a private environment is illegal. If members of this diet believe they do have the right to preserve adultery as a crime, then that's their basing, not mine, but in no way am I going to be a party to that. I am proud that despite disagreements over parts of this bill, I have voted with the leader of the Liberal Republican party, who I have had many disagreements with over the years, but at least doesn't have the brass neck to impose his view of morality on his constituents themselves Ben Sullivan ( TUSC Leader) |
| Date | 22:51:45, June 18, 2018 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Fredoom of Equality Act of 4410. |
| Message | Mr Speaker, A clarification on this bill and why we voted the way we did. We share the views regarding the Country Municipal Alliance and their betrayal of their voters. However we do not support all the contents of this bill. Individuals today are free to call themselves whatever they wish. But the goverment goes by how one looks and your biological gender. As it should be it is a form of identification and information that is needed. We would like for the choice of Marriage to be left with the church as it is where one should marry. And if you do not wish to marry in a church then it shall be the local goverments. We do not beleive that children are done any favours with three mothers and four fathers. A relationship is between two people. We see crossdrwssung as a mental illness that needs to be handled with delicate care. These people need help not acceptance. Article 4 is one of the most destructive. These people could be dangerous and therefore we can not allow them to walk freely. Abortion after the fetus grows heart, nerves and a brain is not moral. All criminals should be watch over and if you have nothing to hide you don't have to worry. Lastly population growth is needed to maintain a welfare state and for the expansion of the empire. I yield Alice Teodurschu |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 113 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 280 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill |