Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:05:34
Server time: 07:54:25, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 4410

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Communist Coalition

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4411

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:52:25, June 19, 2018 CET
FromMordusian National Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4410
MessageWe find it despicable that the NMA is more trusting of communist and socialist parties than they are for right-wing parties, be they conservative or nationalistic. A clear bias has been shown, and we at the MNF refuse to support this - we stand by AF.

Date14:10:32, June 19, 2018 CET
FromPeople's Communist Coalition
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4410
MessageConservatives and right-wing nationalists should be shunned for their collective hatred of progress, and no heavily conservative parties were included in the proposal, so your votes don't affect that. It's now just a question if the NMA will side with progress and logic, or conservatism and irrational tendencies.
Regards,
Sebastian Gallagher

Date14:26:21, June 19, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4410
MessageWhile I am no fan of the PCC, they are vastly preferable to the nationalist reactionaries of the National Front. Let us bury the hatchet of the last chaotic parliamentary term and stand up for progress
- Francine Jones

Date20:57:59, June 19, 2018 CET
FromSoul & Spirit
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 4410
MessageI for one would disagree on our bias towards left wing parties. Your assumption that because left wing parties are more commonly included in the decisions of the NMA must mean that we are biased towards those parties is illogical and frankly stupid.

Correlation does not equal causation.

As for the cabinet bill, we believe that this is overkill. We only need 180 seats and yet we are including 267. A much better and easier to uphold deal must be taken.

Edward Bennington
Leader of The New Mordusian Alliance

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 213

no
  

Total Seats: 147

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

    Random quote: "Men's natures are alike, it is their habits that carry them far apart." - Confucius

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 65