Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 03:11:43
Server time: 04:48:16, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): MyungJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 4411

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4411

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:42:57, June 19, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4411
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Socialists have stuck with the NMA through thick and thin, but, to be honest, I'm starting to question my judgement, as the NMA tried to get us into a cabinet with the MNF, which we refused, for the good of civil liberties and our belief in anti-racism.

If I'm going to be honest, I don't see any major differences between the NMA and the AF. They are both big tent, civic nationalist, moderate conservative parties, who's only major dividing line is their stance on the monarchy.

If they cannot manage to form a deal with the other parties, then I advise that they form a grand coalition together. It would, funnily enough, probably be the most ideologically coherent coalition

Francine Jones,
SP Leader,
MP for Medingsbury

Date21:04:01, June 19, 2018 CET
FromSoul & Spirit
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4411
MessageI would like to personally ask Francine Jones a question if possible. Does the leader of the Socialist party not forget when Alternative future tried to ban pornography and heavily restrict the internet? What about the child abuse fiasco? What about how every single bill made by the NMA has been shot down by Alternative Future with no consideration for it's validity. In what world does this sound like us having no differences? A man or woman who believes that there is no differences between us clearly has no eyes.

Edward Bennington,
Leader of The New Mordusian Alliance

Date22:39:06, June 19, 2018 CET
FromAlternative Future
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4411
MessageYou still have not apologised for your disguising comments about child abuse by the way.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 18

no
      

Total Seats: 342

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "If you're not turned on to politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49