We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4415
Description[?]:
This bill seeks to undo the damaged caused by government interference into industry. It seeks to remove the nationalization of the telephone industry while still providing access to those who are low-income. It seeks to provide freedom for corporations to remunerate their employees as they see fit. And it seeks to remove the nationalization of the prostitution industry. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: There is a state monopoly on prostitution.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: Telephone lines are provided free of charge to all citizens.
Current: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families, and regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families, and regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Current: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Proposed: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:14:46, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We hereby open this bill to debate. Jeffery Rawson Federalist Parliament Leader |
Date | 20:16:08, June 26, 2018 CET | From | New Liberal Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, What is there to say? The Federalists continue to attack the most vulnerable of our citizens. Nothing in this bill makes people's lives better. We will vote against it. Rebecca Doyle MP for Prosperity Cove Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals |
Date | 20:31:33, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The NLP continues to make assertions with no statistical or logical backing. How does cheaper services constitute attacking the most vulnerable? How does greater employment adversely affect the most vulnerable? Cheaper services and more money in the hands of the average consumer, hmm it seems like the NLP is fear-mongering once again. Jeffery Rawson Federalist Parliament Leader |
Date | 21:42:15, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Scientian Enclave | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Scientians support articles 3 (phone service reform) and 4 (prostitution reform). However the Scientians do not support ending tripartism for salary caps. We may support article 1 (nation's power grid) if it is changed to "each region owns and maintains its own power grid". - Ambassador Norbert Lowell of the Scientian Enclave |
Date | 21:44:40, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We ask of the Scientian Enclave as to why they don't support article 2? Isn't remuneration supposed to be between the employer and the employed? What use is there of setting a salary cap other than to hinder ambition and innovation? Jeffery Rawson Federalist Parliament Leader |
Date | 21:59:30, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Scientian Enclave | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The present policy already delegates this process between workers and employers. Salary caps can serve to ensure individuals are not excessively compensated when others have not seen improvements to their living standards. We agree however that this is not always appropriate and thus support the delegation of this to worker and employer organizations. - Ambassador Norbert Lowell of the Scientian Enclave |
Date | 22:01:47, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We will take it under advisement to potentially remove article 2 before moving this proposal to vote. Jeffery Rawson Federalist Parliament Leader |
Date | 23:19:02, June 26, 2018 CET | From | Hutori Party | To | Debating the F-143: Denationalization & Economic Freedom Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, While we would like to see article 2 be left in place, we would not oppose the bill if it were removed. Brett Martin MP for Wrightstown Chancellor of the Commonwealth of Hutori |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 197 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 152 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 56 |
Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington |