Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:52:07
Server time: 06:07:52, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: F-145: Police Equipment Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4415

Description[?]:

This bill seeks to properly equip Police Officers with the equipment necessary to complete their jobs.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:15:14, June 26, 2018 CET
From Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We hereby open this bill to debate.

Jeffery Rawson
Federalist Parliament Leader

Date20:18:03, June 26, 2018 CET
From New Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

No one, not even the state, has the right to murder a person. This bill puts lethal weapons in the hands of the police - an agent of the state. This bill can only lead to more police-related deaths and killings. We will not stand for it!

Rebecca Doyle
MP for Prosperity Cove
Parliamentary Leader of the New Liberals

Date20:24:29, June 26, 2018 CET
From Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker

Does the New Liberal Party then stand against the Armed Forces being equipped with lethal weapons?

Natalie Cook
Royalist House Leader

Date20:27:51, June 26, 2018 CET
From Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would like to ask, does the NLP specialize in fear-mongering? We agree that no one has the right to murder a person yet the hypocritical NLP affirms the right of a mother to murder her unborn child. The logical inconsistency, the blind obedience of the NLP to their USPH masters is laughable. We simple want to put the tools required for officers to defend the public and themselves in the hands of the those very same officers. Besides, the data is clear when Officers are armed murder rates drop significantly, as do other forms of violent crime. Does the NLP support law breakers?

Jeffery Rawson
Federalist Parliament Leader

Date21:53:24, June 26, 2018 CET
From Scientian Enclave
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We support increasing access to tools of self-defence and threat neutralization for our police officers. We will support this bill.

- Ambassador Norbert Lowell of the Scientian Enclave

Date03:29:05, June 28, 2018 CET
From Liberal Party of Hutori
ToDebating the F-145: Police Equipment Act
MessageMr. Speaker

These are common sense approaches, and we fully support our Coalition allies here to empower our local law enforcement agencies to have the tools to keep the peace.

Daniel MacKenzie
Minister of Justice

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 197

no
  

Total Seats: 152

abstain
  

Total Seats: 56


Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

Random quote: "Congress is like diapers; it should be changed regularly as it gets full of the same thing." - Seen on a bumper sticker

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62