We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear weaponry in warfare, 1st part
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fatherland Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2199
Description[?]:
| We should reserve a right to retaliate when we are victims of use of weapons of massdestruction. No one will be foolish enough to kill us with these inhuman weapons if we have a threat to aggressors. That's why we need to withdraw from this treaty in order to change our current policy to a new one. Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the WMD Limitation Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:02:41, March 13, 2006 CET | From | Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Nuclear weaponry in warfare, 1st part |
| Message | I remind you that we are the ONLY country that has ratified this treaty. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 322 | ||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |