We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of January 4423
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4424
Description[?]:
The People's Socialist Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Grand Imperial Union of Dankuk (단국 대제국). |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 10,000,000,000 DRA | 60,000,000,000 DRA | 30,000,000,000 DRA |
Foreign Affairs | 30,000,000,000 DRA | 20,000,000,000 DRA | 20,000,000,000 DRA |
Internal Affairs | 30,000,000,000 DRA | 118,167,672,758 DRA | 16,167,672,758 DRA |
Finance | 25,000,000,000 DRA | 10,000,000,000 DRA | 10,000,000,000 DRA |
Defence | 15,000,000,000 DRA | 75,167,672,758 DRA | 75,167,672,758 DRA |
Justice | 30,000,000,000 DRA | 35,000,000,000 DRA | 65,000,000,000 DRA |
Infrastructure and Transport | 70,000,000,000 DRA | 150,000,000,000 DRA | 170,000,000,000 DRA |
Health and Social Services | 60,000,000,000 DRA | 75,000,000,000 DRA | 77,000,000,000 DRA |
Education and Culture | 75,000,000,000 DRA | 207,167,672,758 DRA | 207,167,672,758 DRA |
Science and Technology | 50,000,000,000 DRA | 55,000,000,000 DRA | 55,000,000,000 DRA |
Food and Agriculture | 60,000,000,000 DRA | 1,000,000,000 DRA | 1,000,000,000 DRA |
Environment and Tourism | 50,000,000,000 DRA | 30,000,000,000 DRA | 10,000,000,000 DRA |
Trade and Industry | 60,000,000,000 DRA | 193,167,672,758 DRA | 93,167,672,758 DRA |
Total | 565,000,000,000 DRA | 1,029,670,691,032 DRA | 829,670,691,032 DRA |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:56:31, July 13, 2018 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Budget proposal of January 4423 |
Message | Dear Speaker, We are on the fence with this proposal. While the bill saves money, I am curious as to why the massive cut to Internal Affairs? I don't see the point of Cutting Environment and Tourism or Trade and Industry for that matter. Head of Government funding, I will let the Yeonguijeong look into that. Seol Dae-Kwan Finance Minister |
Date | 00:09:21, July 14, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Budget proposal of January 4423 |
Message | Dear Speaker, Whilst we are on the fence. We see no need for these cuts. Like we said before, your introductions will lead to us needing to make full use of money available rather than cutting it. Until you can give a valid reason. We will vote against this on the basis of it being unnecessary Sean Hong Prime Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 104 | |
no | Total Seats: 75 | |
abstain |
Total Seats: 81 |
Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |