Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 00:30:06
Server time: 23:29:53, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | dnobb | Dx6743 | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2199

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Defense and Federalist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2200

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:52:32, March 14, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageShame!!!

Date06:05:59, March 14, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageYou brought this on yourself.

Date10:21:23, March 14, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageHey, why did I get left out? Bastards!

Date12:10:27, March 14, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageYou abstained on the last proposed cabinet:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=57401

Date18:39:30, March 14, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageI can see how the new Beluzian Dichotomy is shaping up!~

Date20:29:22, March 14, 2006 CET
FromPartisans And Artisans League
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageWhy do you include so many parties? You could easily have included just 2 of the 3 others and formed a more realistic cabinet...

Date21:05:32, March 14, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageWhy could he not have included the right-wing parties and formed a cabinet? This is pathetic

Date21:18:10, March 14, 2006 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageI don’t know CUP, perhaps because I tried that, and you voted no every time?

PPP, I am sorry, but you logged online, voted, but did not vote on the cabinet bill. Otherwise, you would have been included.

Date05:48:20, March 15, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageFINALLY ONE PASSED!!!!

Date16:42:15, March 15, 2006 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2199
MessageIt's about time... I made my first proposal nearly 2 weeks ago

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 75

no
   

Total Seats: 25

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "The payment of taxes gives a right to protection." - James M. Wayne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76