We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4428
Description[?]:
Members of the Presidium, The LLP has always been a strong supporter of a safe Lodamun. For this reason we want to reintroduce a former proposal of the LLP. The LLP believes that the government should and can do more to combat religious extremism and fundamentalism. For this reason we propose the following: 1. The LLP supports the right of people to decide what sort of clothes they wear but thinks this should be limited in public buildings. According to us public buildings should be a neutral place, for this the LLP suggests a ban on religious clothing and symbols in public buildings. 2. Futhermore the LLP wants to take on cults or religious extremists groups. For this reason we want to ban the right of free advertising for religious organizations. Only with the approval of the government religious organizations should be able to advertise, in this way we can stop unwanted or dangerous religions to promote themselves. 3. Currently our has no state religion, we want to keep it that way, but we want the government to act when there are cults of Fundamentalist religions threatening our society. Harper Anderson LLP MP on Internal Affairs |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: It is not permitted to wear religious clothing or religious symbols in public buildings.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards evangelism and religious advertising.
Old value:: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Current: Religions are permitted to freely promote and advertise themselves.
Proposed: Religions are required to obtain government approval before promoting themselves or advertising in any manner.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Current: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Proposed: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:12:06, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II |
Message | Mr Speaker, We will oppose these fascist bigotry. Francis Young Leader of the Republican Party |
Date | 20:13:47, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Democratic Union Lodamun | To | Debating the Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II |
Message | Mr Speaker, The Conservative Democrats are in favor of these proposals made by the LLP. Luca Brankic Party Leader Conservative Democratic Union Lodamun |
Date | 21:54:41, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Lodamun Labour Party | To | Debating the Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I find it amusing that our proposal is called fascist bigotry, certainly when it is from a party that gave National Socialists a place in the government. But perhaps I understand why this lays sensitive with the leader of the Republican Party, because he himself is part of a cult! Harper Anderson LLP MP on Internal Affairs OOC: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=57&start=1000 |
Date | 21:57:14, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Lodamun Labour Party | To | Debating the Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I find it amusing that our proposal is called fascist bigotry, certainly when it is from a party that gave National Socialists a place in the government. But perhaps I understand why this lays sensitive with the leader of the Republican Party, because he himself is part of a cult! Harper Anderson LLP MP on Internal Affairs OOC: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=57&start=1000 |
Date | 19:09:21, July 22, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Socialist Party | To | Debating the Combat Religious Extremist and Fundamentalist Influence Act II |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We are in support of article 3, however, the other articles we will not support. Therefore we will not support this bill. Sophie Hill PSP MP on internal affairs |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 151 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 444 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements. |
Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |