We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A Safe Society
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Conservative party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2201
Description[?]:
Hunters are allowed to have guns, cheffs are allowed to have large knifes and axes, and so forth, and so forth. But do we want them to walk around on the streets with theese weapons if they so wish ?. We feel that every weapon has a designated area, and should be limited there. We feel that the current law makes the society just a bit less safe, as there a quarrel easily can be made to a quarrel where innocent people are hurt (for excample two persons carrying weapons outside a kindergarten get furious at eachother, takes up weapon and starts to shoot). We therefore want this small change. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:36:04, March 14, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | we support |
Date | 11:18:47, March 14, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | we're supporting too |
Date | 15:33:57, March 14, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | What is wrong with the way we have it now? |
Date | 10:40:53, March 15, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | I listed my reasons in the description. |
Date | 14:56:22, March 15, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | What is wrong with the current legislation. |
Date | 12:28:07, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | Quoting the description: "We feel that the current law makes the society just a bit less safe, as there a quarrel easily can be made to a quarrel where innocent people are hurt (for excample two persons carrying weapons outside a kindergarten get furious at eachother, takes up weapon and starts to shoot)." |
Date | 20:41:47, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the A Safe Society |
Message | We'll oppose this measure. Property owners have the right to restrict weapons and that is how it should be. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 185 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 51 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "The root source of wealth is human ingenuity. This has no known bounds, so the amount of wealth in existence can always be increased. That's why capitalism is called 'making money.'" - Marc Geddes |