Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:35:40
Server time: 16:24:19, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic Reform of 99

Details

Submitted by[?]: One Nation Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2200

Description[?]:

My friends and associats,

the time has come to embrace a government for good. We need a state that provides for its people or the taxes they pay are wasted. I am passionate in my convictions that the people can determine their own future, this is why we need to rid our private sector of unnecessery regulations.

We need to ensure that we provide for the poor and not simply look out for the interests of the rich. If you oppose this you are fascists hell bent on oppressing the people.

HAIL THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:29:58, March 14, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageArticle one opposed! This article will stifle the economy!

Article 2 we oppose as well as it'll keep people on minimum wage and give them no incentive to move up if we provide for their family.

Article 3 We oppose as well since strikes wreck havoc on the economy.

Where is the debate on this? Why did you move it to a vote without debate. That is irresponsible.

Date17:06:50, March 14, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageThis is a revolution. Call out the Militia ! This is just to much at the same time. We see this is some form of revolution is being planned. And as Minister of Finance we are calling the military on high alert to prepare for socialist revolution, which can spark (or is already initiated) by this.

Date17:21:58, March 14, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
Messageviva le revolution

Date18:29:41, March 14, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageWe'ld liked to have some debate first, before moving this to a vote...

Date18:33:34, March 14, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageAnd it's "la" revolution, not "le", Comrade Rightist.

:P

Date19:11:59, March 14, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageThis is a revolution GLDS brought upon the state by the ONCP, if it is the upper circle of the party or not, we know not. But it seems to be a revolution, but we simply do not know yet. Assemble ministers and discuss this.

Date19:21:51, March 14, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageDown with the ONCP! Down with the ONCP!

Date19:50:17, March 14, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageTHink it is the ONCP that initiated this revolution.. So.. if it comes to it, will the Patriot Party support the SCP in restoring law and order if needed to ?

Date20:10:35, March 14, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageWe'll help restore law and order yes.

Date11:00:20, March 15, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Economic Reform of 99
MessageTurmoil within the ONCP.
More woth the Tukarali daily.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 83

no
    

Total Seats: 159

abstain
  

Total Seats: 57


Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78