Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 02:25:46
Server time: 05:34:13, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Mariage Ammendment

Details

Submitted by[?]: Telemon Lutheran Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2065

Description[?]:

Marriage is a sacred bond shared between a man and a women, it is not appropriate for same sax people to get married. For God sake its Amam and Eve not Adam and Steve! So I am asking for a ban on gay marriages.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:13:39, June 07, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageAgreed

Date09:18:43, June 07, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageIts wrong and should be banned!

Date09:18:49, June 07, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageIt's wrong and should be banned!

Date09:19:07, June 07, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
Messageopps posted that twice

Date09:19:47, June 07, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
Messageopps posted that twice

Date10:16:28, June 07, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
Messagei think its a bug

Date15:02:11, June 07, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageNO, I'm not repeating my reasons for opposing this, read earlier posts in other debates, suffice to say that allowing all citizens to be treated eqaully and gain state benefits is not wrong it is eminently sensible

Date00:54:19, June 08, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageI think we all know each others stance by now.

Date01:58:50, June 08, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageAgreed and correct your spelling

Date13:16:09, June 08, 2005 CET
FromTelamon National Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageI am sure I have voted yes to this before.

Date15:26:17, June 09, 2005 CET
FromPeople Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessageWell, if it's what the people want to do, we should let them. I always thought that the act of marriage was an act of love and if two people love eachother, let them marry.

Date01:52:19, June 10, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Mariage Ammendment
MessagePeople party, sounds like you are all having orgies over there.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 69

no
    

Total Seats: 73

abstain
 

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

Random quote: "Real politics is the possession and distribution of power." - Benjamin Disraeli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83