We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agricultural Demands
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unie van Boere Party (UvBP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4436
Description[?]:
| Article 1 First of all this is a question of efficiency. Only supporting less well-off farmers will disenfranchise those farmers wich already produce commodities succesful within the co-operative market. The goals of an Agrarian mindes government shouldn't be to divide farmers but to give them equal support. Ofcourse now we don't have an Agrarian mindes government. Agriculture is the backbone of this society especially since we are cutting tips to capitalism. So let's support it. Article 2 All Saridanese Provences and states aren't on the same Page considering Their separate material and economic conditions. Therefore this issue isn't to be influenced by less agricultural regions. Farmer states need equal representations and the confederal democracy is failing to do that. Article 3 We are not in Any ecological fishing crisis so why not let our producers deliver fresh fish. Article 4 As long as God allows for our slaughter the government must out! Article 5 We do not trust the SDU to take upon Any market regulations! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Current: Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.
Proposed: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Current: Small farms are encouraged to merge together into larger ones.
Proposed: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Current: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Proposed: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on animal welfare in livestock farming.
Old value:: The government enforces high animal welfare standards.
Current: The government enforces moderate animal welfare standards.
Proposed: The government enforces religious codes for livestock farming.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the use of pesticides.
Old value:: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Current: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Proposed: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:23:54, August 08, 2018 CET | From |  Saridan Democratic Union | To | Debating the Agricultural Demands |
| Message | we are willing to approve article 2,3 and 4 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 500 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller |