We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Proposal to End Monopolies and Incentive Market Concurrence
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Verde Sombrio
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4438
Description[?]:
"It's a consensus among economists that monopolies lead to inefficiencies, since they lack the same incentives to provide good products at a reasonable price than companies in a more competitive market. So, we propose to, on one hand, restrict monopolies in certain sectors, and remove certain restrictions which only serves as a barrier to new entrants in that market, besides lowering corporate tax to ease the formation of new small businesses" Henrique Meneses Tzu Economist and Dark Green Party advisor for Economics |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on monopolies (this general law is superceded by other laws relating to specific parts of the economy).
Old value:: There is no policy on monopolies, they are unregulated.
Current: Monopolies are forbidden, and are actively broken up.
Proposed: Monopolies are only forbidden in specific sectors of the economy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 18
Current: 12
Proposed: 14
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 89 | ||
no | Total Seats: 166 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command." - Niccolo Machiavelli |