Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:01:27
Server time: 03:58:32, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | saintstiiizy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Animal Act of 2200

Details

Submitted by[?]: Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2202

Description[?]:

The Eagle is so cliché. We believe the Toucan would be a good alternative.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:59:24, March 16, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageThought it had a nice ring to it.. The Tukaralian Toucan
:-)

Date18:37:16, March 16, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageImage of Toucan please :)

Date20:35:03, March 16, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageWe'll oppose the measure to change the national animal.

Date02:04:54, March 17, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageWe'll also oppose.

Date05:16:09, March 17, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageCom'on, who doesn't know a toucan... It's a large colourful bird with a big beak

Date05:35:25, March 17, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
Messageand why we oppose. We hate toucans.

Date12:11:34, March 17, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageThe eagle is so cliché... And what's wrong with toucans? It's no Kialatika..

Date14:25:50, March 17, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageI think I would rather go back to that than to go to a toucan and make us the laughing stock of the planet.

Date18:29:00, March 17, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageOOC: The toucan is the national bird of Belize. I've never heard anyone laughing about it...

Date19:40:08, March 17, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageOOC: *Cracks up laughing* Probablly because no one knows that? I know I did and yes, I did crack up laughing when I heard it.

Date13:42:12, March 18, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the National Animal Act of 2200
MessageUhm.. seen image. NO :D

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 76

no
    

Total Seats: 200

abstain
   

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64