We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Officers Appointment Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Social Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4459
Description[?]:
We, the legislative body of our nation, as representatives of our people should be able to determine which military officers are deemed capable and fit for their positions. For the well-being of our nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Appointment of military officers
Old value:: The Ministry of Defense is authorized to appoint military officers.
Current: The head of state is responsible for the appointment of military officers.
Proposed: The national legislature is responsible for the appointment of military officers
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 85 | |||
no | Total Seats: 148 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "In heaven all the interesting people are missing." - Friedrich Nietzsche |