We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberté et Égalité
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4461
Description[?]:
Law to defend workers from arbitrary dismissals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:36:23, September 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers |
Message | What about employers rights ? |
Date | 16:36:50, September 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers |
Message | If this laws remain guaranteed ,we will vote yes. |
Date | 16:37:57, September 25, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers |
Message | I mean rights. |
Date | 07:41:40, September 26, 2018 CET | From | Liberté et Égalité | To | Debating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers |
Message | Workers have the right to strike, and if they exercise it, they must have the guarantee that they will not end up unfairly dismissed. If not, it is a right only proclimate. Employers maintain rights the right to dismiss in any other circumstance. |
Date | 16:41:41, September 26, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Internationalist Party | To | Debating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers |
Message | Who will decide what is arbitrary dismisals ? This is not good law , because of radicalism ,we vote no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no | Total Seats: 301 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |