Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:44:47
Server time: 16:15:12, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Ost | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Law on the defense of the right to striking workers

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberté et Égalité

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 4461

Description[?]:

Law to defend workers from
arbitrary dismissals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:36:23, September 25, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Internationalist Party
ToDebating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
MessageWhat about employers rights ?

Date16:36:50, September 25, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Internationalist Party
ToDebating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
MessageIf this laws remain guaranteed ,we will vote yes.

Date16:37:57, September 25, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Internationalist Party
ToDebating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
MessageI mean rights.

Date07:41:40, September 26, 2018 CET
FromLiberté et Égalité
ToDebating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
MessageWorkers have the right to strike, and if they exercise it, they must have the guarantee that they will not end up unfairly dismissed. If not, it is a right only proclimate.

Employers maintain rights the right to dismiss in any other circumstance.

Date16:41:41, September 26, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Internationalist Party
ToDebating the Law on the defense of the right to striking workers
MessageWho will decide what is arbitrary dismisals ?
This is not good law , because of radicalism ,we vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 301

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

    Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 51