Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:57:12
Server time: 01:02:47, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): DanivonX | Interstellar. | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Lex Barba de Unio

Details

Submitted by[?]: Clara Aurora - COSIRA

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4470

Description[?]:

Demetria Barba
Senatrix

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:27:46, October 15, 2018 CET
FromOptimates
ToDebating the Lex Barba de Unio
MessageSenators,

We strongly urge that all Senators vote against the proposed bill. What is fundamental to marriage is the idea that it is simply beyond the purview of the state: it is a private contract between two individuals; inviolable and sacred. The man is the king and his wife the queen of their marital home, and it is on that basis - the importance of family and particularly of marriage - that marriage must always remain sacrosanct and free from undue state interference.

To make my point abundantly clear, Senators, let me put it like this: if you vote to relax the circumstances in which a partner may file for divorce, then you vote to destroy the institution of marriage, which is so fundamental to family life. And if you destroy the institution of marriage, then what do we have left? One thing is certain: our private lives shall not be so private, and bureaucracy and moral decay shall win the day.

Date12:35:10, October 16, 2018 CET
FromFactio Republicana Socialistica
ToDebating the Lex Barba de Unio
MessageSenators,

We strongly oppose this bill and we are glad to see our coalition partners share our view. I must admit however that I find our allies' argument rather baffling. If the Optimates believe that marriage ought to be beyond the purview of the state as a strictly private contract, then would it not make more sense to remove restrictions on divorce? Arguably Senatrix Barba's proposal reduces the involvement of the state in marriage by limiting the amount of recognition the government grants marriages, and it is precisely because of this that we oppose this proposal. Instead we believe that society and the Republic has an interest in marital stability, that in addition to the "private" goods provided by marriage it also provides a public benefit, as it is a political institution in which virtues like altruism and self-sacrifice can flourish, virtues that are not only beneficial to the family unit itself, but also to the overall political and social system of the Republic. So for these reasons we have always defended all forms of marriage within our Republic, not just "traditional" opposite-sex monogamous marriage, but also polygamous, arranged, and same-sex marriage, all of which, in spite of their differences, share their role in promoting virtue and raising virtuous new citizens.

Albertus Laelius Pomponius
Princeps Senatus

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 364

no
  

Total Seats: 386

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

    Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 53