Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:15:56
Server time: 14:44:03, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | johndoe1322 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Federal High-Speed Rail Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Baltusia First

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4481

Description[?]:

Rough route plan: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/490968329583067136/509183516832038927/rail_map.png


The railway will run from San Luis (Santiago) to Johnston (New Egelion), where it will split into a Johnston-Blackwood (Westbrook)
line and a Johnston-Rutledge (Ralston)-New Valois (Attano) line.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:42:00, November 06, 2018 CET
FromGovernment of Tropica
ToDebating the Federal High-Speed Rail Act
MessageMadam Speaker


Our party denounce this piece of trash. Healthcare is globally underfunded and this bill aim to cut even in that in order to build some speed-road.
this is inacceptable.

Yugi green, Senate Minority Speaker.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 101

no
       

Total Seats: 377

abstain
 

Total Seats: 57


Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 40