Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:39:44
Server time: 23:20:15, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government Responsibility Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2203

Description[?]:

This law will put more responsibility on the government, with still keeping liberties.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:28:52, March 19, 2006 CET
FromFree People Party
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageWhat do you think about this bill?

Date22:32:30, March 19, 2006 CET
FromNoordelijk Bevrijding Front
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageHmm, I am in favour of decentralisation of power,. I would support articles 3,4 and 5

Date23:42:36, March 19, 2006 CET
FromMaroon Party
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageIt is far too extreme and would lead to drastic violation of local government's rights, as well as citizens' rights. Furthermore, Article I is just silly. If it's about helping the poor, we should just GIVE THEM MONEY and let them buy stuff they want so they aren't poor instead of providing them with contraceptives, something that should be quite low on their list of concerns.

Date00:48:19, March 20, 2006 CET
FromFree People Party
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageThe first one, to tell you the truth, was an accident. I don't think these affect the citizen's rights either. Maybe it does give a slight infraction on local government, but look at what our people want.

Date00:53:12, March 20, 2006 CET
FromMaroon Party
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageThe violation of Posse Commitatus in Article 3 is likewise unacceptable.

Date01:12:55, March 20, 2006 CET
FromDorvish Popular Front
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageWe like all but article 4. When we say 'like', for the first two articles we simply prefer them to the alternative. Therefore we shall vote yes, but shall put forward a new bill regarding pharmacutical drugs should this pass.

Date01:17:38, March 20, 2006 CET
FromNational Conservative Conference
ToDebating the Government Responsibility Bill
MessageThe CPD stand in line with the Primrose point of view, we too disagree with article 4. We will however vote no to this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 22

no
      

Total Seats: 178

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation.

Random quote: " A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83