We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Whig Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4489
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:42:58, November 21, 2018 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Environmental Reform Act |
Message | Open to debate |
Date | 10:05:07, November 21, 2018 CET | From | New Democratic Labour Party | To | Debating the Environmental Reform Act |
Message | NPL support Artlices 1&2. Not, 3, NDL would support the change of replacement levels to equal |
Date | 10:31:49, November 21, 2018 CET | From | Rutanian Rural Party | To | Debating the Environmental Reform Act |
Message | The RRP does not support means to centralize government power. |
Date | 15:41:16, November 21, 2018 CET | From | Hosian Democratic party of Rutania | To | Debating the Environmental Reform Act |
Message | We agree. |
Date | 18:02:37, November 21, 2018 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Environmental Reform Act |
Message | We have removed article 3, we shall propose the tree replacement levels article in separate legislation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 464 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 108 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 178 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |