Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 02:58:29
Server time: 01:01:30, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democrat League

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2204

Description[?]:

We don't think these kinds of atrocious means belong in modern society and warfare.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:02:00, March 20, 2006 CET
FromFree Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageWe can concur. While banning the use outright is strategic suicide, we can concur with the need to maintain a strategically advantageous moral high-ground whereby we advocate a no first-use policy.

Date20:42:02, March 20, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageWe disagree... all options must be left open in times of war.

Date21:32:25, March 20, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democrat League
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageBiological and chemical weapons aren't the only means to fight a war ...

OOC: In real wars, biological and chemical weapons haven't been used much at all. As far as I know, this only happened in World War I, and we saw how much it helped them ... And I'm talking about wars; fighting against your enemy, not the mass murder of civilians with chemical agents.

Date21:42:43, March 20, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democrat League
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageAnother point is that when biological and chemical weapons were deployed first in a war, they provoked more hostility and resistance than actually being effective in disabling the enemy. We also remember all those nations that used them in wars first, as ruthless, and also most often the losers of the war. (OOC: This might have something to do with the fact that the countries that used them were the aggressors.)

OOC: Apparently, they were also used a little bit in World War II and some colonial wars, but never really on a wider scale, for fear of retaliation.

Date03:47:20, March 21, 2006 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageWe can agree to this.

Date20:19:24, March 21, 2006 CET
FromMalivianese Militarist Party
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageThe fear of retaliation remains with the option that we have unhindered use of all military options. If we start to narrow these options, that fear disappears and the enemy will have better strategy knowing they are able to make a first strike instead of not knowing whether we will make a first strike or not.

Date14:15:49, March 22, 2006 CET
FromFree Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Restricting use of Bio&Chem Weapons
MessageThe fear of biological and chemical RETALIATION is unhindered by this bill. What is hindered is the premise that we strike first with such weapons.
An effective deterrence is still maintained under this legislation which is why I can support it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 179

no
  

Total Seats: 78

abstain
  

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen.

Random quote: "Only the educated are free." - Epictetus

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63