Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5461
Next month in: 03:33:39
Server time: 16:26:20, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Repel of the Public Ownership Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party-Liberals

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4495

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:12:40, December 04, 2018 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the Repel of the Public Ownership Act
MessageMr Speaker
Clearly the Republicans to do not recognise "Democracy", the Public Control Act was passed by Congress yet they wish to repeal it immediately after, they are not respecting the decision that was made. The act has only just been implemented, to great success and popular by the way, repealing it would lead to huge economic instability and cause a loss of faith in Congress.

Daniel Tejan
Senator for Attano

Date17:55:57, December 04, 2018 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Repel of the Public Ownership Act
MessageMr. President

I wasnt aware that less then half of Congress voting on a bill was considered popular. If it were so popular why is that a majority of Congress is voting to repeal it?

Jessica Laurels
Senate Majority Leader
Senator for Ralston

Date18:18:56, December 04, 2018 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party - Syndicalists
ToDebating the Repel of the Public Ownership Act
MessageMr Speaker

The Nationalist caucus of the Republican Party voted in favour previously, clearly they were bullied into voting with the government
In this ridiculous repeal

Daniel Tejan
Senator for Attano

Date22:25:51, December 04, 2018 CET
FromRepublican Party-Liberals
ToDebating the Repel of the Public Ownership Act
MessageMr Speaker

This is a bipartisan piece of legislation.

Senator William Osborne (R-NE)

Date23:13:19, December 04, 2018 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Repel of the Public Ownership Act
MessageMr. Speaker

The Senator from Attano's statement rings rather hallow when members of their own party are voting in line with the government on this Bill, for which we thank the Social Liberal Caucus for their support on this important economic bill. The Baltusian economy has done fine without the government interfering with it; there was no reason for the government to suddenly stick it's nose where it doesn't belong.

Senator Jessica Laurels (R-RA)
Senate Majority Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 340

no
   

Total Seats: 148

abstain
 

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66