We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Health and Safety Liberalisation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvish Popular Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2203
Description[?]:
| This is an absurd and pointless attack on businesses. Some jobs are risky in their nature, and so this feeble regulation only serves to damage our economy. The workers know what sort of job they are applying for and can judge if the money they receive is enough to warrant such a danger. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: There are no set health and safety regulations for industry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:00:20, March 20, 2006 CET | From | Maroon Party | To | Debating the Health and Safety Liberalisation |
| Message | We agree. If a company has a reputation for being dangerous, no one will work there; or people will only work there for very high wages. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 100 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 100 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman |