We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Movimento Liberaldemocratico - P.L.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4500
Description[?]:
| Collegues, this is a storical day: today we write history, we will make our nation more free, rich and happy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the stock exchange(s).
Old value:: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Current: Stock exchanges are allowed and are unregulated.
Proposed: The government has no position on the proliferation of stock exchanges.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Current: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Proposed: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are unregulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Current: All advertising is permitted.
Proposed: All advertising is permitted.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on cryptocurrency.
Old value:: Cryptocurrency is legal and regulated, select private institutions can issue cryptocurrency.
Current: Cryptocurrency is legal and regulated, select private institutions can issue cryptocurrency.
Proposed: The government has no policy on cryptocurrency
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:13:37, December 13, 2018 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act |
| Message | Hadan Al-Maktum, Leader of AR: "Mr Speaker, we would be glad to vote in favor, but we would like to solve this issue: https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Poste_Nazionali_Istaliane . We are concerned about the relations between Poste Istaliane and the Deposits and Consignments Fund https://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Deposits_and_Consignments_Fund_(Istalia) which use the banking service of the National Postal Service. So... we would like abstain until we could find a replacement for the main source of the Deposits and Consignments Fund Thank you" |
| Date | 11:30:11, December 13, 2018 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act |
| Message | Hadan Al-Maktum: "Mr Speaker, we would like propose that the DCF will manage the investments fund of the public pension system (which manage 2 different pension funds, a basic one financed by the general taxation (unfunded system) and another which is instead a funded system which contributions are invested in a fund towards meeting the benefits. The DCF could become the main managing of this system. |
| Date | 14:43:42, December 13, 2018 CET | From | Movimento Liberaldemocratico - P.L. | To | Debating the P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act |
| Message | Collegues, we strongly support AR's proposal. DCF will manage the investments fund of the public pension system. |
| Date | 14:44:01, December 13, 2018 CET | From | Movimento Liberaldemocratico - P.L. | To | Debating the P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act |
| Message | Collegues, we strongly support AR's proposal. DCF will manage the investments fund of the public pension system. |
| Date | 20:43:57, December 13, 2018 CET | From | Fronte Nazionale Istaliano - F.N.I | To | Debating the P.d.L. 2/4499 - Great Liberalization's Act |
| Message | Savio Taddeo, leader of the Istaliano National Front party, disagrees with all the advanced proposals. I will say why: - Article 1 legalizing any advertising without a check could be annoying and even dangerous - Article 2 we are absolutely against a non-government decision on cryptocurrencies, according to us they are a dangerous tool for two reasons, 1) can be used by criminals and by those who recycle dirty money; 2) can put the national currency in difficulty, and it is a global problem. - Article 3 I think a public postal agency should exist, but on this article we can also accept the proposal -Article 4 in our opinion the previous law must not be changed. The stock exchange is very important, we need to protect investors, if this law is approved, it could drive investors away and this could cause a problem to our public debt because it will cause investors to move away. For this, we will vote against. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 168 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 228 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |