We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Hooligan control bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Democracy
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2077
Description[?]:
We propose a tight control on Hooligan and other violent organized groups of any kind to avoid riots and violence between citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:15:14, June 08, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | Hmmm... The Freedom Party was considering this ourselves and we believe we would be in favour due to the freedoms of the general public being infringed if a protest gets violent and threatens their safety. |
Date | 17:00:04, June 08, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | I'm against this because I believe a group that protests should not be denied that right because of some aggressive individuals. |
Date | 17:54:53, June 08, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | Against. |
Date | 20:08:57, June 08, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | But safety is the first prerrogative to have freedom. |
Date | 13:50:38, June 10, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | Hmmm... i think there should be another option for this bill. Police disperse groups that are causing damage to property etc |
Date | 17:40:54, June 17, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist-Bolshevik Party | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | We agree with this motion.We should not let a few ruin the masses. |
Date | 17:49:24, June 17, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Hellenic Front | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | we agree. ooc: Neoliberals, how are you liberal! Liberal parties are about freedom of speech etc. You seem to be heading for an authotarian approach! The opposite of liberal! |
Date | 20:47:20, June 17, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | OOC: It's not a Liberal party, it's a NEOliberal party. There are some differences. |
Date | 18:30:33, June 25, 2005 CET | From | New Party | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | We agree. this is neccessary for the safety of the public. |
Date | 22:17:36, June 26, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | Anyway. Foward with the voting. |
Date | 23:23:25, June 26, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | Surely if any person in public is actually commiting a crime (for example damaging property or assaulting somebody) they will be apprehended under current law anyway. This bill would merely become and excuse to infringe on freedom of assembly. |
Date | 03:10:47, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Hooligan control bill |
Message | We agree with our fellow senators from the Libertarian Alcoholic party (pardon, par-tah), and we would like to point out that inciting a riot is still a crime anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 29 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 315 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 155 |
Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
Random quote: "Anarchy stands for the liberation of the human mind from the domination of religion, the liberation of the human body from the domination of property, liberation from the shackles and restraints of government." - Emma Goldman |