Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 02:09:38
Server time: 17:50:21, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hyraemous | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Hooligan control bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Democracy

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2077

Description[?]:

We propose a tight control on Hooligan and other violent organized groups of any kind to avoid riots and violence between citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:15:14, June 08, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageHmmm... The Freedom Party was considering this ourselves and we believe we would be in favour due to the freedoms of the general public being infringed if a protest gets violent and threatens their safety.

Date17:00:04, June 08, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageI'm against this because I believe a group that protests should not be denied that right because of some aggressive individuals.

Date17:54:53, June 08, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageAgainst.

Date20:08:57, June 08, 2005 CET
FromNew Democracy
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageBut safety is the first prerrogative to have freedom.

Date13:50:38, June 10, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageHmmm... i think there should be another option for this bill. Police disperse groups that are causing damage to property etc

Date17:40:54, June 17, 2005 CET
FromNationalist-Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageWe agree with this motion.We should not let a few ruin the masses.

Date17:49:24, June 17, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Hellenic Front
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
Messagewe agree.

ooc: Neoliberals, how are you liberal! Liberal parties are about freedom of speech etc. You seem to be heading for an authotarian approach! The opposite of liberal!

Date20:47:20, June 17, 2005 CET
FromNew Democracy
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageOOC: It's not a Liberal party, it's a NEOliberal party. There are some differences.

Date18:30:33, June 25, 2005 CET
FromNew Party
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageWe agree. this is neccessary for the safety of the public.

Date22:17:36, June 26, 2005 CET
FromNew Democracy
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageAnyway. Foward with the voting.

Date23:23:25, June 26, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageSurely if any person in public is actually commiting a crime (for example damaging property or assaulting somebody) they will be apprehended under current law anyway. This bill would merely become and excuse to infringe on freedom of assembly.

Date03:10:47, June 27, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Hooligan control bill
MessageWe agree with our fellow senators from the Libertarian Alcoholic party (pardon, par-tah), and we would like to point out that inciting a riot is still a crime anyway.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 29

no
      

Total Seats: 315

abstain
   

Total Seats: 155


Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator.

Random quote: "Anarchy stands for the liberation of the human mind from the domination of religion, the liberation of the human body from the domination of property, liberation from the shackles and restraints of government." - Emma Goldman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 88