We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Overturning the Incest act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Unionist Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4509
Description[?]:
| Incest is disgusting and should be made illegal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on incest.
Old value:: Incestuous acts are legal and incestuous marriages are legally recognised.
Current: Incestuous acts are illegal.
Proposed: Incestuous acts are illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:10:15, January 01, 2019 CET | From | Radical Action | To | Debating the Overturning the Incest act |
| Message | Something being disgusting is not proper justification for it being illegal. |
| Date | 19:53:14, January 01, 2019 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Overturning the Incest act |
| Message | “What about the genetic mutations caused to children conceived of such acts?” |
| Date | 19:53:24, January 01, 2019 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the Overturning the Incest act |
| Message | “Is that valid enough for you.” |
| Date | 22:30:47, January 01, 2019 CET | From | Social Unionist Front | To | Debating the Overturning the Incest act |
| Message | Incestuous acts cause genetic deficiencies and legalising them sends the wrong message to younger generations about the acceptability of incest |
| Date | 22:38:07, January 01, 2019 CET | From | Alliance Beluzia | To | Debating the Overturning the Incest act |
| Message | Inbreeding violates the NAP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 280 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 144 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 76 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician |