Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:38:07
Server time: 14:21:52, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): aai14 | albaniansunited | GLNBei | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4515

Description[?]:

My party is proposing a new Cabinet in which all parties except Republicans and DSPR have a chance to a seat. As we see that this two parties try to take the power for themselves in the Cabinet is it time that we should all get a chance to the Cabinet. This proposes to form a Cabinet with seats for all parties below:
-Democratic Change Movement
-Rutanian Libertarian Party
-Liberal Party
-Rutanian Rural Party
-Hosian Democratic Rut. Party
-United Democratic Party of Rutania

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:34:20, January 12, 2019 CET
FromNational Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Act
MessagePls agree. We have only one shot. Why we should let those two parties to take the power AGAIN for themselves. Is it time that every party has a chance to have atleast one seat in the Cabinet. Thanks.
And if you have complaints that you want other seat or you want more, atleast thank yourself that I am trying to let as many parties in the Cabinet unlike DSPR or Republicans...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 54

no
     

Total Seats: 614

abstain
  

Total Seats: 82


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62